Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2016-06-10 | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a global score of 93.3, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 score. Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro is just a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, it's notably thinner and also newer. Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a much better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 64-bit processor, a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
IPhone 13 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a just a little inferior number of pixels per inch in the screen and a bit worse 1170 x 2532 pixels resolution, it also counts with much more brightness and a bigger display. Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro features just a bit better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro also has better 60 fps video frame rate and a larger aperture to capture better low light photos.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features better battery duration than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3095mAh.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy S7 Active. So if you want that extra features, you can buy iPhone 13 Pro, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy S7 Active, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.