Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2016-06-10 | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, having a overall score of 93.2 against 75.8. Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is extremely heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, it's much thinner and a lot newer. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a slightly better looking display than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a quite bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a very superior CPU than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more CPU cores, a larger amount of RAM memory and a 64-bits processor.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max features just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 4352mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. IPhone 13 Pro Max takes a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also has higher video frame rate and a larger diafragm aperture.
Although iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.