Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 94.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 16.x |
| 2016-06-10 | 2022-09-16 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2796 x 1290 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 460 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4323mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 Pro Max has a global score of 94.9, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's overall score of 75.8. Even though iPhone 14 Pro Max is extremely heavier than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, it's noticeably thinner and much newer. The Galaxy S7 Active features a little sharper display than iPhone 14 Pro Max, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch of screen.
The iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a better memory for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The iPhone 14 Pro Max has a much more powerful processor than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more RAM, a 64-bits CPU and more CPU cores.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max features a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has an 8% bigger battery capacity. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rate and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Although Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy S7 Active. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy S7 Active, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.