Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| -- | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-06-10 | 2019-05-25 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.26 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Black and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) is slightly better than the Galaxy S7 Active, with a 77.8 score against 75.8. The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) is a much newer and just a little thinner cellphone than the Galaxy S7 Active, although it's just a little heavier. Galaxy S7 Active has a better display than Asus ZenFone 6 (2019), because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores. The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory.
The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) features a much better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution and better video frame rate.
Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) counts with longer battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
Although Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.