Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2016-06-10 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's general score of 75.8. The Google Pixel 4 is a notably newer cellphone, and it's also thinner and somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The Google Pixel 4 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a greater amount of RAM and more CPU cores.
The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a brighter display than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a better pixels count in each inch of display. Google Pixel 4 captures just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the same camera aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Google Pixel 4 also has a better 12.2 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
The Galaxy S7 Active features a greater storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 200 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4 costs more than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.