Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Just black |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a general score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 score. Google Pixel 4a is a notably newer cellphone, and it's also somewhat thinner and lighter than the Galaxy S7 Active. The Google Pixel 4a features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
Galaxy S7 Active features a sharper display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution. The Google Pixel 4a has a bit better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Google Pixel 4a also has a camera with more mega-pixels.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3140mAh.
The Google Pixel 4a costs a lot more than Galaxy S7 Active, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.