Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2021-06-25 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 17.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Honor 50 Pro is a bit better than the Galaxy S7 Active, having a 77 score against 75.8. Even though Honor 50 Pro is just a bit heavier than the Galaxy S7 Active, it's incredibly thinner and also much newer. The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a better display than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch of screen.
Honor 50 Pro features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Honor 50 Pro has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4 more processing cores and more RAM.
Galaxy S7 Active and Honor 50 Pro have really similar battery performance. The Honor 50 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting pictures and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.