Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2024-03-22 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Plastic | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 576 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a score of 92.1, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 general score. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design design is much newer and thinner, but incredibly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1280 x 2800px and a just a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with much more brightness and a really bigger screen.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a better performing CPU than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a higher number of cores and more RAM memory. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much greater storage for apps and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 1 TB internal storage.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures and video, a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5600mAh battery size.
Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy S7 Active. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the Galaxy S7 Active, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.