Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2016-06-10 | 2018-11-09 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 Fit is slightly better than the Galaxy S7 Active, with a 77 score against 75.8. LG G7 Fit's construction is newer, lighter and notably thinner than Galaxy S7 Active. The Galaxy S7 Active and the LG G7 Fit both have extremely similar processors, both of them have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
LG G7 Fit features a little bit better display than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a little bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels, a bigger display and way more brightness. The LG G7 Fit features a little bit better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a way tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a camera with a lot higher 16 megapixels resolution.
LG G7 Fit counts with a much greater memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal memory capacity, the LG G7 Fit also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S7 Active features superior battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 33 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.