Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Titan gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is better than Galaxy S7 Active, getting an 85.4 score against 75.8. The LG K92 is a incredibly newer and thinner phone than the Galaxy S7 Active, although it's just a little bit heavier. LG K92 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S7 Active features a better looking display than LG K92, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. LG K92 has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the LG K92 also counts with a camera with way more MP.
The LG K92 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. LG K92 has a battery duration that is very similar to the battery performance in Galaxy S7 Active.
LG K92 is way more expensive than the Galaxy S7 Active, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.