Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-05-07 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Mirror black |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG Q70 is just a bit better than the Galaxy S7 Active, with a 77.9 score against 75.8. The LG Q70 is a much newer and somewhat thinner device than Galaxy S7 Active, but it is also a bit heavier. LG Q70 has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the LG Q70 also has 4 more cpu cores.
Galaxy S7 Active has a more vivid display than LG Q70, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel amount per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. LG Q70 shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting photos and video in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the LG Q70 also counts with a much better 32 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
LG Q70 features a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage. LG Q70's battery life is very similar to the battery life in Galaxy S7 Active.
Although LG Q70 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.