Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Holographic white |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Stylo 6 has a general score of 76.7, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 global score. LG Stylo 6 is a extremely newer and thinner cellphone than Galaxy S7 Active, although it's heavier. The LG Stylo 6 has a bit better processing power than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the LG Stylo 6 also has 4 more CPU cores.
Galaxy S7 Active has a better looking screen than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher display pixels density. Galaxy S7 Active counts with a slightly better camera than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a camera in the back with a worse resolution, it also counts with a lot better video resolution and a bigger aperture.
The LG Stylo 6 features a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity. LG Stylo 6 counts with a battery life that's just as good as the battery life in Galaxy S7 Active.
LG Stylo 6 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Galaxy S7 Active, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.