Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2016-06-10 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is a bit better than Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 overall score. LG V35 ThinQ's construction is newer, somewhat lighter and notably thinner than Galaxy S7 Active. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has just a bit better looking screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, it also counts with a just a little greater screen pixel density. LG V35 ThinQ has a much greater memory for applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S7 Active features improved battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The LG V35 ThinQ has a little bit better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a much higher 16 megapixels resolution back camera and a larger camera aperture for better low-light captures and videos.
The LG V35 ThinQ costs a little more money than Galaxy S7 Active, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.