Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a global score of 87.6, which is better than the Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 overall score. Even though the LG V60 ThinQ is heavier than the Galaxy S7 Active, it's thinner and extremely newer. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
The Galaxy S7 Active features a better display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a slightly better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The LG V60 ThinQ features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The LG V60 ThinQ features a little bit better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a back facing camera with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
The LG V60 ThinQ costs more money than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.