Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge is better than Galaxy S7 Active, getting a score of 89.6 against 75.8. Although Motorola edge is just a little heavier than the Galaxy S7 Active, it's just a bit thinner and much newer. Galaxy S7 Active features a much better looking screen than Motorola edge, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Motorola edge features a superior storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB. Motorola edge counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a greater number of faster cores.
Motorola edge has a lot better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola edge also counts with a lot more megapixels back camera. Motorola edge counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 13% larger battery size.
The Motorola edge is way more expensive than Galaxy S7 Active, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.