Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2021-08-19 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Lite is better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, getting an 87.1 score against 75.8. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite body weights the same than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, but it is thinner. Galaxy S7 Active counts with a much better screen than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a greater number of pixels per inch in the display.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 96 GB more internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a little bit better performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a greater camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also counts with faster video frame rates and a camera with lot more mega pixels. Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with better battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.