Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2021-08-19 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a general score of 92.8, which is way better than Galaxy S7 Active's global score of 75.8. Motorola Edge 20 Pro's body is notably newer and a lot thinner, but just a bit heavier than Galaxy S7 Active. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per display inch and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a greater processing power than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more CPU cores and a larger amount of RAM. Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a very superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro captures way better pictures and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light images and video, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a back camera with a lot better 108 mega pixels resolution.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with just a little better battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.