Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2022-08-18 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Mineral Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge (2022) is better than the Galaxy S7 Active, getting an 84.7 score against 75.8. The Motorola Edge (2022) is a extremely newer device, and it's also somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter than Galaxy S7 Active. Motorola Edge (2022) has just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and more CPU cores.
The Galaxy S7 Active has a better looking display than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better screen density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Motorola Edge (2022) has a very superior camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge (2022) also counts with higher video frame rate and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge (2022) features superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Although Motorola Edge (2022) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy S7 Active. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Galaxy S7 Active, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.