Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, getting a overall score of 78.5 against 75.8. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion construction is extremely newer, a lot thinner and a little lighter than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a little sharper display than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has much lower brightness and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel number in each inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory and a lower number of cores (but faster).
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a much better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and video in low light situations, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a much more mega-pixels camera. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features just a little better battery performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 10 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.