Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is a bit better than Galaxy S7 Active, with a overall score of 80.9 against 75.8. Even though Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is a bit heavier than Galaxy S7 Active, it's thinner and a lot newer. The Galaxy S7 Active counts with just a bit better screen than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a way smaller display and way less brightness, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater pixels count in each inch in the screen.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy S7 Active counts with a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with 3 more processing cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 25% greater battery size. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a much more megapixels back facing camera and a way better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.