Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a global score of 83.4, which is better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's score of 75.8. Even though Motorola Edge 40 Pro is just a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, it's thinner and much newer. The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM and less cpu cores.
Galaxy S7 Active has a bit better screen than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a lot darker screen and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much better 50 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.