Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2024-08-29 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a score of 81.9, which is a bit better than the Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 global score. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a notably newer phone, and it is also somewhat thinner and just a little lighter than the Galaxy S7 Active. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a little sharper screen than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a bit worse 1256 x 2760px resolution and a quite worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a much brighter display and a bigger screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a way bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy S7 Active has a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has less processing cores and 4 GB lesser RAM.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo takes much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a bit superior battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 4310mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.