Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a general score of 86.3, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 global score. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro design is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's, although it's also just a little heavier. Motorola Edge 50 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S7 Active have very similar screens, because although the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a much lower pixels density, it also counts with a much brighter screen and a lot larger screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 4 less cores (although faster) and 8 GB lesser RAM.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution camera and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photography and video.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a bit superior battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.