Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-07-08 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Surfing blue |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G Plus is slightly better than Galaxy S7 Active, getting a global score of 82.6 against 75.8. The Moto G 5G Plus design is newer and somewhat thinner than Galaxy S7 Active's, but it is heavier. Moto G 5G Plus features a bit superior processor than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a greater number of cores (and faster).
Galaxy S7 Active features a much better looking display than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels number in each screen inch and a slightly better 1440 x 2560px resolution. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 32 GB more internal storage.
Moto G 5G Plus captures way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a same size aperture, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a much more mega pixels camera. The Moto G 5G Plus features superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.