Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Smoke black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Power has a global score of 76.1, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's overall score of 75.8. The Moto G Power body is extremely newer and a little bit thinner, but also a little heavier than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The Galaxy S7 Active features a much better screen than Moto G Power, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Moto G Power counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. Moto G Power has a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Moto G Power also has more processing cores (although they are slower).
The Moto G Power features longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. The Moto G Power features a slightly better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rates and a same size aperture, the Moto G Power also has a lot better 16 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Motorola Moto G Power is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.