Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2016-06-10 | 2021-01-14 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.28 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | $ 160.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G Power (2021) is a little bit better than Galaxy S7 Active, with a global score of 76.5 against 75.8. Although the Moto G Power (2021) is somewhat heavier than the Galaxy S7 Active, it's a little bit thinner and notably newer. Moto G Power (2021) has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Moto G Power (2021) also has 4 more cpu cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features a lot better screen than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with way more pixels per inch of display and a lot higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Moto G Power (2021) counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same aperture and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Moto G Power (2021) also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a much higher resolution camera.
The Moto G Power (2021) counts with a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G Power (2021) features longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Moto G Power (2021) is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.