Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is better than the Galaxy S7 Active, getting a global score of 86.2 against 75.8. The Moto G200 5G is a extremely newer and thinner cellphone than the Galaxy S7 Active, although it is also a little bit heavier. Galaxy S7 Active features a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater count of pixels per screen inch.
Moto G200 5G has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4 more processing cores and a larger amount of RAM. The Moto G200 5G shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a much more megapixels camera.
Moto G200 5G has a greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Moto G200 5G has improved battery performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.