Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G71 5G is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, with a overall score of 82.9 against 75.8. Moto G71 5G's construction is way newer, thinner and a bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. Moto G71 5G has a little bit better performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more RAM and more processing cores.
Galaxy S7 Active counts with a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G71 5G, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a greater amount of pixels per inch of screen and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The Moto G71 5G has more memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Moto G71 5G takes much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing photos or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Moto G71 5G also counts with higher video frame rates and a back facing camera with a way higher 50 megapixels resolution.
Moto G71 5G counts with superior battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.