Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G8 Power is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, having a 76 score against 75.8. The Motorola Moto G8 Power body is notably newer and just a bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's, although it is a little heavier. Moto G8 Power features a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Moto G8 Power also has a greater number of cores.
Galaxy S7 Active has a much better display than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Moto G8 Power takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a F1.7 aperture, the Moto G8 Power also has a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
The Moto G8 Power counts with much more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. Moto G8 Power counts with longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola Moto G8 Power is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the Galaxy S7 Active, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.