Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2023-09-14 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | -- |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G84 is a little bit better than the Galaxy S7 Active, with a overall score of 80.9 against 75.8. The Moto G84 design is much newer, extremely thinner and much lighter than Galaxy S7 Active. The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a much greater processing power than Moto G84, although it has lesser cores and 8 GB less RAM.
Galaxy S7 Active features a little sharper display than Moto G84, because although it has a really smaller screen and much worse brightness, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher count of pixels per inch in the screen. The Moto G84 features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory.
The Moto G84 shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures and video in low light environments, and they both have the same video resolution, the Moto G84 also counts with faster video frame rate and a back-facing camera with lot more MP.
Motorola Moto G84 features better battery performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.