Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-06-10 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z Force has an overall score of 75.8, which is a bit better than Galaxy S7 Active's global score of 75.8. Even though the Moto Z Force and Galaxy S7 Active were released only 3 months apart, the Moto Z Force is lighter and thinner. The Motorola Moto Z Force has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. They have a Quad-Core processing unit and 4 GB of RAM.
The Galaxy S7 Active features a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1440 x 2560px resolution, the Galaxy S7 Active also counts with a just a bit greater pixel density. Moto Z Force has just a bit better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Moto Z Force also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Motorola Moto Z Force features a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 32 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with just a bit better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Although Motorola Moto Z Force is a better device, it is a bit more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.