Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Oxford blue |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G has an overall score of 84.6, which is better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's global score of 75.8. Although the Motorola One 5G is heavier than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, it's thinner and noticeably newer. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a brighter screen than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better pixel number per inch in the display.
Motorola One 5G features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola One 5G features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola One 5G also has a greater number of faster cores.
Motorola One 5G takes a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola One 5G also has a camera with way more MP. The Motorola One 5G counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola One 5G is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.