Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2016-06-10 | 2021-01-14 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G Ace is slightly better than Galaxy S7 Active, getting an 81.6 score against 75.8. Motorola One 5G Ace's body has the same thickness than Galaxy S7 Active, but it's somewhat heavier. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a much better display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel amount in each display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Motorola One 5G Ace features a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has more cpu cores.
Motorola One 5G Ace features superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 25% bigger battery size. Motorola One 5G Ace takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a back camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution.
Although Motorola One 5G Ace is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy S7 Active. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy S7 Active, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.