Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2016-06-10 | 2019-08-16 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Action has a global score of 78.5, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's score of 75.8. The Motorola One Action is a incredibly newer device, and it is also just a bit thinner and a little lighter than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. Galaxy S7 Active features a better looking display than Motorola One Action, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater pixel amount in each inch in the screen.
Motorola One Action features a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola One Action has a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola One Action also has 4 more CPU cores.
The Motorola One Action captures a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low light photos and videos, they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same video definition and a back-facing camera with a 12 mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a little longer battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has a 14 percent greater battery size.
Motorola One Action is more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.