Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has a global score of 79.8, which is a bit better than the Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 global score. Motorola One Hyper's construction is incredibly newer and thinner than the Galaxy S7 Active's, but it is also a bit heavier. The Motorola One Hyper has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola One Hyper also has more cpu cores.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a more vivid screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater display pixels density. Motorola One Hyper counts with a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a battery duration that's just as good as the Galaxy S7 Active one. Motorola One Hyper features a very superior camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.