Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2016-06-10 | 2019-05-15 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Blue and Brown |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision has a score of 80.7, which is slightly better than Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 score. Motorola One Vision's body is way newer, a bit lighter and thinner than Galaxy S7 Active. The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a much better screen than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater pixel density.
The Motorola One Vision has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Motorola One Vision also has a greater number of faster cores. The Motorola One Vision has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
The Motorola One Vision shoots greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, a same size aperture and the same video definition, the Motorola One Vision also has a much higher 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera. The Galaxy S7 Active has a bit longer battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 14 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.