Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2016-06-10 | 2019-09-05 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom is a bit better than the Galaxy S7 Active, with an 80 score against 75.8. The Motorola One Zoom design is way newer and somewhat thinner than the Galaxy S7 Active's, although it's also a bit heavier. Galaxy S7 Active features a sharper screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels number per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Motorola One Zoom has just a little better performance than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola One Zoom also has more cpu cores. Motorola One Zoom features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Zoom also has a lot higher resolution camera.
The Motorola One Zoom has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 128 GB against 200 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active and the Motorola One Zoom feature very similar batteries duration.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy S7 Active. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy S7 Active, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.