Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is much better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, having a global score of 87 against 75.8. Even though Motorola razr (2020) is a little bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, it's incredibly thinner and also notably newer. The Motorola razr (2020) has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
Galaxy S7 Active has a better looking screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and way more pixels per inch of display. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a way better resolution back facing camera.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a way better battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 43% bigger battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy S7 Active. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Galaxy S7 Active, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.