Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | -- |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 576 pixels per inch | -- |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, having a overall score of 79.2 against 75.8. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a way newer and much thinner cellphone than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, but it is also a bit heavier. Galaxy S7 Active has a way better performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster) and lesser RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a way better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has way less brightness and a much smaller display. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light images, it also counts with a lot better video quality and a camera with a lot better resolution.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a very superior memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with greater battery performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.