Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2021-07-29 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 is slightly better than the Galaxy S7 Active, with an 80.8 score against 75.8. The Nokia XR20 is a way newer cellphone than the Galaxy S7 Active, although it's heavier and just a little thicker. Nokia XR20 counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more cpu cores and more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with just a bit better looking screen than Nokia XR20, because although it has a lot smaller display and less bright screen, it also counts with a greater pixels quantity per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Nokia XR20 features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Nokia XR20 has just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity. The Nokia XR20 takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video definition, the Nokia XR20 also counts with higher 60 frames per second video frame rate and a much higher resolution back camera.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Nokia XR20, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.