Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-05-21 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Neo is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, having a general score of 77.7 against 75.8. The OPPO Find X2 Neo is a way newer device, and it's also way thinner and just a little lighter than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. Galaxy S7 Active counts with a bit more vivid display than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has much less brightness and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores. OPPO Find X2 Neo features a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo shoots greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a camera in the back with way more mega pixels.
OPPO Find X2 Neo and Galaxy S7 Active feature extremely similar batteries, although the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has 4025mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.