Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Ocean |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a score of 83.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy S7 Active's general score of 75.8. The OPPO Find X2 Pro is a incredibly newer and thinner device than Galaxy S7 Active, although it is also somewhat heavier. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with just a bit better display than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a little worse display density, it also counts with a much bigger display, way more brightness and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and faster). The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a camera with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution and better video frame rate. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little better battery duration than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.