Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-06-10 | 2019-10-05 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 576 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A20s has a global score of 77, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 general score. The Samsung Galaxy A20s design is noticeably newer, just a little bit lighter and way thinner than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The Samsung Galaxy A20s features a processor that is just as good as the Galaxy S7 Active one, and although the Samsung Galaxy A20s has a greater number of cores , they both have a 4 GB RAM memory.
Galaxy S7 Active has a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a way greater display density. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active captures clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a back facing camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video quality and a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos.
The Galaxy A20s features a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy S7 Active and Galaxy A20s both feature really similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.