Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G has a general score of 79.9, which is a bit better than the Galaxy S7 Active's overall score of 75.8. Galaxy A25 5G's body is extremely newer and somewhat thinner than the Galaxy S7 Active's, although it is also just a little bit heavier. Galaxy S7 Active counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a lot smaller display and much worse brightness, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity in each inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features a lot better performance than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and 2 GB lesser RAM memory.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a back camera with way more megapixels. The Galaxy A25 5G features greater battery performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.