Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a score of 79.4, which is a bit better than Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 overall score. Although the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is somewhat heavier than the Galaxy S7 Active, it's somewhat thinner and noticeably newer. Galaxy S7 Active features a much more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has less RAM and an inferior number of cores.
Galaxy S7 Active has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a really smaller screen, and they both have the same screen brightness, the Galaxy S7 Active also counts with a better count of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a much better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy A35 5G counts with more memory for apps and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has better battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 25% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.