Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2016-06-10 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is much better than the Galaxy S7 Active, getting a score of 90.7 against 75.8. Samsung Galaxy A52 is a notably newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than the Galaxy S7 Active, although it's also just a bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a bit better processor than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4 more processing cores and more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Galaxy A52 counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1 TB and 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 captures greater pictures and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a back camera with much more megapixels. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 13 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.