Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, getting a 91.1 score against 75.8. The Galaxy A52s design is notably newer and thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The Galaxy A52s counts with a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a better looking screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixel amount in each inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy A52s captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light captures, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more MP.
The Galaxy A52s counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.