Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a general score of 92.9, which is way better than the Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 overall score. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's body is notably newer and thinner, but just a little bit heavier than Galaxy S7 Active. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S7 Active has a better looking screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a lot better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a back camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G UW features just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.