Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, having a general score of 88.1 against 75.8. Samsung Galaxy F62 is a incredibly newer and just a little thinner cellphone than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, but it's heavier. The Galaxy S7 Active features a brighter screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen, a little brighter display and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a Quad-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy F62 has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light images, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy F62 has a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 7000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.