Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-06-10 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is way better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, with a general score of 97.6 against 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy Fold design is notably newer and extremely thinner than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's, but it's also notably heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a lot better pixels number per screen inch and a quite better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 8 GB more RAM memory and 4 more CPU cores. Galaxy Fold has a much better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Galaxy Fold features just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 10 percent larger battery capacity. Galaxy Fold has a little bit better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same resolution camera in the back, the Galaxy Fold also has a bigger aperture and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Fold, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.